<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera removes ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gorey.com.au/archives/1245/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gorey.com.au/archives/1245</link>
	<description>Random thoughts and observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:37:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyte</title>
		<link>http://gorey.com.au/archives/1245/comment-page-1#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>kyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 22:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gorey.com.au/archives/1245#comment-255</guid>
		<description>Opera is also available for Mac OSX.  I don&#039;t mind Opera but still tend to fall back to Firefox.  However... I am having a lot of resource issues with FF, since version 1.04 and am looking for a viable alternative.  a Free, adless Opera as my secondary browser to Safari, might just do the trick.

The thing I especially like about it is its ability to be a bit of a chameleon as far as some websites are concerned which insist on IE and which on Mac, I refuse to use because its old and ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera is also available for Mac OSX.  I don&#8217;t mind Opera but still tend to fall back to Firefox.  However&#8230; I am having a lot of resource issues with FF, since version 1.04 and am looking for a viable alternative.  a Free, adless Opera as my secondary browser to Safari, might just do the trick.</p>
<p>The thing I especially like about it is its ability to be a bit of a chameleon as far as some websites are concerned which insist on IE and which on Mac, I refuse to use because its old and ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

