James and Margaret (age six next week) will be changing schools in 2010.
We’re not unhappy with their current school (Suttontown), just with a decision of the principal regarding their class for next year.
South Australia is unique, in our experience, for allowing children to start school during the year.
In Victoria and Western Australia, children start prep at the beginning of the year if they are old enough at a cut-off point, which I think is around April.
The twins were born in December, which means they qualified for a full year of prep (called reception in South Australia) in any state.
In South Australia, children who turn five during the year start school at the beginning of a term, right up to the final term of the year.
As a consequence, there are new children coming into a class all the time.
Juliet was a “reading mum” at Suttontown this year; the only one in fact. She listened to children read their designated books.
She observed that having new children enter the class throughout the year was quite disruptive to the teachers and the other students who were more advanced.
Perhaps because of its unique system, South Australia combines classes across year groups. At Suttontown, that means there is a Reception/Year One class, a Year 1/2 class and so on.
Having completed a whole year in R/1, we assumed that Jim and Maggie would progress to the Year 1/2 level, however that was not to be.
The principal decided to keep them in R/1 next year.
Juliet received the information earlier this month and handled the discussions, so I’m reporting second hand, but the reasons didn’t make sense to us.
The principal said the twins were not being “kept down” and they would have “leadership roles” in the class next year. Leadership at age six!
What bothered us was that James is very advanced for his age, especially with reading. His class teacher said he is two and a half years above his age for reading, which means he’s at the level of an eight year old.
We were concerned that keeping him in a class with five-year-olds, who are just starting school (and progressively starting throughout the year) would be detrimental to his development.
There was a danger, in our view, that he could become bored at school and suffer behavioral problems.
As for Maggie, she cried when she heard the news. All her friends were going up to the next year level and she was devastated to hear (from the teacher, not us) that she would be staying in R/1.
The principal made it clear to Juliet that his decision was not negotiable.
In the 20 years that I’ve known her I’ve never seen Juliet so upset or angry.
I looked at it dispassionately and decided immediately that we would switch them to another school.
I originally considered the Catholic primary school, but the fees were just too expensive for two children, about $1600 a year each.
Given that public education isn’t free in South Australia, we could not afford the private school fees while the older children are costing us a substantial amount to have them enrolled at the state high school.
So I suggested to Juliet that we enrol Jim and Maggie at Mount Gambier North Primary, which is actually the school we are zoned to.
We are on the border between Gambier North and Suttontown, but chose the latter last year when we arrived because we thought the small-school environment would be better after our positive experience at Porepunkah in Victoria.
Suttontown has under 100 students, while Gambier North has about 250.
Juliet went to Gambier North and asked for an appointment to see the principal, who agreed to meet her straight away. Juliet phoned me at work and I went there immediately for the meeting.
We didn’t criticise Suttontown to the principal, but asked her opinion of how she would manage a child who is advanced for his age at reading.
She said peer stimulation was the best strategy; that it’s important to group gifted children together so they challenge each other.
This confirmed our view it would have been detrimental to James to keep him in a junior class with predominantly beginner students.
We completed the enrolment paperwork that night and actually feel relieved now we made the decision.
We think the new school will be better for Jim and Maggie for a range of reasons: peer stimulation, closer to home, more students, greater sporting and music options, and after-school hours care if needed.
Everyone we’ve spoken to about this agrees we have done the right thing.
We weren’t sure how the twins would react, but we told them this morning and walked with them to the new school.
James was initially reticent, but by the time he saw the school he was hooked. Maggie embraced the idea immediately.
One of their current classmates is also switching schools for different reasons, so they will start the year knowing at least two other children.
It was interesting talking to the Gambier North principal about twins. She thinks it’s a good idea to separate them at some stage, but agreed to keep them together in 2010 because they are starting at a new school.
We’re all looking forward to it.
I hope it goes well with the twins.
Changing schools can be a difficult and traumatic experience, especially if one twin is academically ahead of the other.
From my memories I recall having to repeat my first year of high school, because my twin and I turned 12 at the beginning of secondary education, she being more mature scholastically, and being kept together meant the teacher demanded unrealistic performance from me…pretty soon I got tagged ‘slow learner’ and the competition to keep up with my twin, lead to devastating consequences.
I think you and Juliet have made an excellent and wise decision for James and Maggie.
Twitter: mgorey
says:
It makes sense to separate twins in the classroom, I think, around age seven or eight.
I agree that the South Australian system of continuous enrollment for Reception is a very bad policy.
From my own knowledge, I am not aware of any other Australian state or territory that has a similar policy.
Have any of your children (or yourself during you schooling) attended school in other states?
If so, did you notice any differences between the states?
I was educated at four different primary schools, two in SA and two in NSW. I completed my entire secondary schooling in Mount Gambier.
A primary school principal once told my Mum that there wasn’t any difference nowadays in the educational standards between the states.
However, I found that there was still a difference.
The educational standard in SA is as a rule higher than in other states.
I have spoken to others who were educated in both SA and other states and this observation of mine seems to hold true.
Apparently the states with the lowest educational standards are QLD and WA (I think there has been a lot of controversy in the last few years about the outcomes-based education model used in WA).
Schooling in SA compared to NSW (my own experiences) seems to be based around traditional academic learning.
Of course this doesn’t suit everyone, but it did suit me and I assume that this is what a lot of parents are most concerned about.
I remember moving to NSW towards the end of Reception and the NSW teacher was shocked at the high standard of work expected of students in SA.
One aspect of the South Australian educational system I think that does need to be improved is the very strict zoning system used to determine the schools students are eligible for.
In NSW, I believe a zoning system does exist, but it offers parents a lot more flexibility regarding school choice.
In the 1980′s, the Thatcher government in the UK abolished school zones and replaced this with an ‘educational passport’.
This meant that all British school students has a right to be educated at any state school within the UK.
I think a similar system to this, is worth exploring in Australia, to increase parental choice regarding their children’s schooling.
Twitter: mgorey
says:
Our children have attended schools in three states. As parents we haven’t noticed much difference between state systems, except the continuous enrolment for reception/prep in South Australia and Victoria ending primary school in Year 6.
The WA education system was under significant strain in 2007-08, mainly through a shortage of teachers, although we were lucky with the school our kids attended, which was very good. Lower performance achievements in WA are skewed by the higher proportion of Aboriginal children.
The best primary school our children have attended was Porepunkah in Victoria. It was just a happy environment with a strong sense of community and a good group of people.
I agree with you about zoning. I know in Mount Gambier that some people choose to live or not live in particular areas because of the school zones.